Skip to content

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Comprehensive Review 🏥

Introduction and Historical Perspective 📋

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents one of the most significant advances in gastroenterology, transforming the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. First performed successfully in 1968 by McCune and colleagues, ERCP has evolved from a purely diagnostic procedure to become primarily a therapeutic intervention. This endoscopic technique allows direct visualization and instrumentation of the biliary and pancreatic ductal systems, enabling minimally invasive treatment of conditions that previously required major surgery. Today, with over 500,000 procedures performed annually in the United States alone, ERCP remains an essential tool in managing biliary obstruction, choledocholithiasis, pancreatic disorders, and various other pancreaticobiliary pathologies1.

Equipment and Technical Aspects 🔧

The Duodenoscope

Unique design features: - Side-viewing optics (versus forward-viewing) - Elevator mechanism for cannula manipulation - Large working channel (3.2-4.2 mm) - 120-degree field of view - Length approximately 125 cm

Components: 

Essential Elements:
├── Optics system (side-viewing)
├── Elevator control
├── Air/water channels
├── Suction channel
├── Working channel
└── Angulation controls (up/down, right/left)

Accessory Equipment

Cannulation devices: 1. Standard cannula: 5-7 French, tapered tip 2. Sphincterotome: Built-in cutting wire 3. Needle-knife: Fine monopolar electrode 4. Guidewires: 0.025-0.035 inch diameter - Hydrophilic vs. non-hydrophilic - Various tip configurations

Therapeutic accessories: - Extraction balloons (8-20 mm) - Dormia baskets (various designs) - Mechanical lithotripters - Dilation balloons (4-20 mm) - Stents (plastic 5-11.5 Fr, metal 6-10 mm) - Biopsy forceps - Cytology brushes2

Procedural Technique 🏥

Pre-procedure Preparation

Patient evaluation: 1. History and consent: - Prior surgeries (especially gastric/biliary) - Allergies (contrast, medications) - Anticoagulation status - Prior pancreatitis

  1. Laboratory assessment:
  2. Coagulation parameters
  3. Liver function tests
  4. Amylase/lipase (baseline)

Antibiotic prophylaxis: - Indicated for: - Anticipated incomplete drainage - Primary sclerosing cholangitis - Immunosuppression - Pancreatic pseudocyst intervention - Common regimen: Ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone

Sedation Approaches 💉

Conscious sedation (most common): - Midazolam + fentanyl/meperidine - Allows patient cooperation - Faster recovery

Monitored anesthesia care (MAC): - Propofol-based - Deeper sedation - Anesthesia provider required

General anesthesia: - Complex/prolonged procedures - High-risk patients - Failed conscious sedation

Step-by-Step Procedure

1. Patient Positioning

  • Left lateral decubitus or prone
  • Prone provides better fluoroscopic visualization
  • Head turned to facilitate secretion drainage

2. Duodenoscope Insertion

  • Through mouth to second duodenum
  • "Short scope" position optimal
  • Identify papilla of Vater

3. Cannulation Technique

Selective Cannulation Strategies:
├── Direct cannulation (guidewire-assisted)
│   ├── Tangential approach
│   ├── Gentle probing
│   └── Wire advancement under fluoroscopy
│
├── Precut sphincterotomy (if standard fails)
│   ├── Needle-knife papillotomy
│   ├── Needle-knife fistulotomy
│   └── Transpancreatic precut
│
└── Advanced techniques
    ├── Double-guidewire technique
    ├── Pancreatic duct stent assistance
    └── Rendezvous procedure

4. Cholangiography/Pancreatography

  • Contrast injection under fluoroscopy
  • Identify anatomy and pathology
  • Avoid overfilling (pancreatitis risk)
  • Document with spot films

5. Therapeutic Interventions

Based on findings and indications3

Clinical Indications 📊

Established Indications

Biliary Indications ✅

1. Choledocholithiasis: - Most common indication - Stone extraction after sphincterotomy - Success rate >90% for stones <10mm

2. Biliary obstruction: - Malignant strictures (palliation) - Benign strictures (postoperative, PSC) - Stent placement (plastic or metal)

3. Bile leaks: - Post-cholecystectomy - Post-liver transplant - Trauma

4. Cholangitis: - Urgent drainage - Stone removal - Stricture treatment

5. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: - Dominant stricture treatment - Brush cytology for surveillance

Pancreatic Indications 🥞

1. Chronic pancreatitis: - Pancreatic sphincterotomy - Stone extraction - Stricture dilation - Stent placement

2. Pancreatic duct disruption: - Traumatic - Post-surgical - Pseudocyst communication

3. Pancreas divisum (symptomatic): - Minor papilla sphincterotomy - Dorsal duct stenting

4. Ampullary tumors: - Diagnosis (biopsy) - Ampullectomy (selected cases)

Controversial/Evolving Indications

  • Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
  • Idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis
  • Pancreatic cancer staging
  • ERCP-guided cholangioscopy

Therapeutic Techniques 💊

Sphincterotomy

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST): - Fundamental ERCP skill - Electrocautery to divide sphincter - Creates permanent opening

Technique: 1. Achieve deep bile duct cannulation 2. Position sphincterotome 3. Elevate cutting wire 4. Apply current (cut/coagulation blend) 5. Incise in 11-1 o'clock direction

Size determination: - Small: Up to transverse fold - Medium: To proximal margin of papilla - Large: Full sphincterotomy

Complications: - Bleeding (2-5%) - Perforation (0.3-0.6%) - Pancreatitis (3-5%)4

Stone Management Techniques

Standard Extraction

For stones ≤10-15 mm: 1. Adequate sphincterotomy 2. Extraction balloon or basket 3. Sweep bile duct clear 4. Occlusion cholangiogram confirms clearance

Large Stone Management

Options for stones >15 mm:

1. Mechanical lithotripsy: - Captures stone in basket - Crushes with mechanical force - Success rate 80-90%

2. Balloon sphincteroplasty: - Large balloon dilation (12-20 mm) - After small EST - Preserves sphincter function partially

3. Cholangioscopy-guided laser/EHL: - Direct visualization - Laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy - For refractory stones

4. Temporary stenting: - When complete clearance fails - Allows stone softening - Repeat ERCP in 3-6 months

Biliary Stenting

Plastic Stents

Characteristics: - Diameters: 5-11.5 French - Materials: Polyethylene, Teflon - Shapes: Straight, single/double pigtail - Patency: 3-4 months average

Indications: - Benign strictures - Temporary drainage - Bile leaks - Bridge to surgery

Self-Expanding Metal Stents (SEMS)

Types: - Uncovered: Tissue ingrowth, permanent - Covered: Removable, prevents ingrowth - Partially covered: Compromise design

Advantages: - Larger diameter (6-10 mm) - Longer patency (6-9 months) - Better palliation

Primary use: Malignant obstruction5

Tissue Sampling Techniques

1. Brush cytology: - Sensitivity: 30-60% for malignancy - Specificity: >95% - Multiple passes improve yield

2. Forceps biopsy: - Higher sensitivity than brushing - Risk of bleeding higher - Combine with brushing

3. Fine needle aspiration: - Through duodenoscope - For pancreatic masses - Requires expertise

4. Cholangioscopy-directed biopsy: - Highest diagnostic yield - Direct visualization - Specialized equipment needed

Complications and Risk Management ⚠️

Overall Complication Rate: 5-10%

Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP)

Most common complication (3-10%)

Risk factors: 

Patient-related:
- Young age
- Female gender
- Prior PEP
- Normal bilirubin
- Suspected SOD

Procedure-related:
- Difficult cannulation
- Multiple pancreatic injections
- Pancreatic sphincterotomy
- Precut sphincterotomy
- Balloon dilation of intact papilla

Prevention strategies: 1. Rectal NSAIDs: 100mg indomethacin or diclofenac 2. Pancreatic stent: For high-risk cases 3. Aggressive hydration: Lactated Ringer's 4. Minimize pancreatic manipulation

Hemorrhage

Incidence: 1-2% (up to 5% with sphincterotomy)

Risk factors: - Coagulopathy - Anticoagulation - Portal hypertension - Large sphincterotomy - Anatomical variants

Management: - Immediate: Epinephrine injection, thermal therapy - Delayed: Repeat endoscopy, angiography

Perforation

Types and locations: 1. Periampullary (most common): - From sphincterotomy - Usually retroperitoneal - May manage conservatively

  1. Duodenal wall:
  2. Scope trauma

  3. Often requires surgery

  4. Bile duct:

  5. From instrumentation
  6. Stent placement may suffice

Management depends on: - Location and size - Timing of recognition - Patient stability

Cholangitis

Incidence: 1-3%

Prevention: - Complete drainage - Prophylactic antibiotics when indicated - Avoid overdistension

Cardiopulmonary Complications

  • Related to sedation
  • Aspiration risk
  • Hypoxemia
  • Arrhythmias
  • Myocardial stress6

Special Situations and Advanced Techniques 🔬

Surgically Altered Anatomy

Billroth II gastrectomy: - Forward-viewing scope often needed - Reversed orientation at papilla - Higher failure rate

Roux-en-Y anatomy: - Standard ERCP usually impossible - Options: - Balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP - Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP - Percutaneous approach - EUS-guided procedures

EUS-Guided Biliary Access

When ERCP fails: - EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy - EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy - EUS-rendezvous procedures - Success rates 80-90%

Cholangioscopy

Direct visualization systems: - Single-operator cholangioscopy (SpyGlass) - Direct peroral cholangioscopy - Narrow-band imaging capabilities

Applications: - Indeterminate strictures - Targeted biopsies - Stone therapy guidance - Tumor mapping

Pancreatoscopy

  • Less commonly performed
  • Technical challenges greater
  • Main pancreatic duct stones
  • Stricture evaluation

Quality Indicators and Performance Metrics 📈

Pre-procedure Quality Indicators

  1. Appropriate indication documented: >95%
  2. Informed consent: 100%
  3. Antibiotic prophylaxis when indicated: >95%
  4. Risk stratification performed: >95%

Intraprocedure Metrics

Cannulation success rates: - Overall bile duct: >85-90% - Native papilla: >95% - Pancreatic duct (when intended): >85%

Common bile duct stone clearance: - Stones <10 mm: >90% - All stones: >85%

Post-procedure Indicators

  • Adverse event documentation: 100%
  • 30-day follow-up for complications
  • Complete procedure reports
  • Photo documentation of findings7

Training and Competency 🎓

Training Requirements

Minimum case numbers (ASGE guidelines): - Total procedures: 200 - Therapeutic procedures: 75-80 - Sphincterotomies: 40 - Stone extractions: 20 - Stent placements: 20

Competency assessment: - Technical success rates - Complication rates - Cognitive knowledge - Clinical judgment - Continuous quality improvement

Learning Curve Considerations

  • Basic cannulation: 180-200 cases
  • Therapeutic competence: 250-300 cases
  • Advanced techniques: Ongoing
  • Maintenance: 75+ annually

Future Directions and Innovations 🚀

Technological Advances

1. Artificial Intelligence: - Polyp detection assistance - Cannulation guidance - Complication prediction - Quality metrics tracking

2. Enhanced Imaging: - 3D cholangiography - Contrast-enhanced techniques - Molecular imaging integration - Real-time image guidance

3. Robotic ERCP: - Precision control - Tremor elimination - Remote procedures - Training applications

Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Drug-eluting stents: - Chemotherapy delivery - Anti-inflammatory agents - Antifibrotic compounds

Radiofrequency ablation: - Malignant strictures - Tumor debulking - Improved stent patency

Photodynamic therapy: - Cholangiocarcinoma treatment - Palliative option

Preventive Strategies Evolution

  • Improved risk stratification algorithms
  • Novel pharmacological prevention
  • Technical refinements
  • Patient selection optimization

Cost-Effectiveness and Healthcare Economics 💰

Economic Considerations

Compared to surgical alternatives: - Shorter hospital stays - Faster recovery - Lower overall costs - Reduced morbidity

Cost drivers: - Equipment and accessories - Facility fees - Sedation/anesthesia - Complications management - Repeat procedures

Value-Based Care Metrics

  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Quality of life measures
  • Time to return to work
  • Long-term effectiveness
  • Resource utilization

Conclusion 📝

ERCP has evolved remarkably from its diagnostic origins to become an indispensable therapeutic tool in managing pancreaticobiliary diseases. The procedure demands not only technical expertise but also sound clinical judgment, comprehensive patient evaluation, and meticulous attention to safety. Modern ERCP practice emphasizes appropriate patient selection, risk stratification, and prevention of complications, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis.

The integration of advanced imaging modalities, the development of specialized accessories, and the emergence of alternative techniques like EUS-guided interventions have expanded therapeutic possibilities while improving safety profiles. As we look to the future, artificial intelligence, robotic assistance, and novel therapeutic devices promise to further enhance the efficacy and safety of ERCP.

Success in ERCP requires continuous learning, quality improvement initiatives, and multidisciplinary collaboration. While the procedure carries inherent risks, adherence to best practices, appropriate training, and careful patient selection ensure that ERCP remains a cornerstone in the minimally invasive management of pancreaticobiliary disorders. As technology advances and our understanding deepens, ERCP will continue to evolve, offering improved outcomes for patients with complex pancreaticobiliary pathology.

  1. Chapter 322: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - ERCP, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 21st Edition ↩

  2. ASGE Technology Committee. Technology status evaluation: equipment for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 85:532, 2017 ↩

  3. Figure 322-16: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine ↩

  4. Freeman ML et al: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909, 1996 ↩

  5. Almadi MA et al: Plastic vs. self-expandable metal stents for palliation in malignant biliary obstruction: A series of meta-analyses. Am J Gastroenterol 112:260, 2017 ↩

  6. Table 322-1: Complications of ERCP and Their Management, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine ↩

  7. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 81:54, 2015 ↩